What is RAG development?
Retrieval-augmented generation grounds model output in selected sources retrieved at request time. A production RAG system needs ingestion ownership, access filtering, retrieval evaluation, citations, and a response policy.
RAG development
You bring the documents, the access rules, and the questions people actually ask. We build the retrieval, wire the citations, and score it before it goes live.
01
Ingestion from the systems that already hold the answers, with identity, role, document, and field-level access enforced at query time rather than bolted on after.
02
Every response points at the document it came from, and abstains when the sources do not cover the question. Freshness targets and deletion ownership are settled up front.
03
Your questions, expected citations, and known bad answers, wired so retrieval, abstention, latency, and cost can be re-checked before anything ships.
RAG is the right tool when the answer lives in material that changes or that not everyone should see. Accuracy gets measured on your representative queries — we will not quote you a generic percentage.
Not the right call if the source material is unowned, duplicated, or chronically stale, or a conventional search interface already meets the user need.
01
Answers must use changing or private source material.
02
Users need citations or traceability back to governed sources.
03
Document ownership and access rules can be made explicit.
Retrieval-augmented generation grounds model output in selected sources retrieved at request time. A production RAG system needs ingestion ownership, access filtering, retrieval evaluation, citations, and a response policy.
RAG fits questions that must use changing or private source material. Fine-tuning is a different tool: it can shape model behavior or output form, but should not be used as a substitute for current governed knowledge.
Builderz uses three entry offers: Architecture and delivery sprint ($3K-$5K), Production build ($10K-$40K), Reliability and rescue sprint ($5K-$15K). The project brief determines which offer fits; the proposal then defines scope, owner, acceptance criteria, exclusions, payment schedule, and change control.
Builderz starts with the workflow, authority boundaries, failure modes, and acceptance tests. Reliability targets, security controls, support terms, and deployment constraints are written into the accepted scope rather than implied as blanket guarantees.
Bring representative documents and queries, expected citations, access rules, known bad answers, freshness requirements, and a labeled evaluation set.
Let's work together
Tell us what is blocked, who owns the decision, and what budget is approved. Qualified briefs get a one-business-day review.
Acceptance in writing
Criteria agreed before build starts
Proposal in 48h
After a qualified scoping call
Change control
Scope, exclusions, and owners named