Multi-agent orchestration
We run the deterministic pipeline, one bounded agent, and orchestrated roles against the same eval set. Multi-agent ships when it wins on your numbers.
01
A baseline built on the simplest architecture that could work. Every added role has to beat it on the same evaluation set before it stays in the design.
02
Permitted tools, inputs, outputs, and handoff schemas per role, plus who owns shared state and what happens when two roles disagree about it.
03
Trace, retry, circuit-breaker, escalation, and rollback rules, with per-role and end-to-end latency, reliability, and cost thresholds you agreed to operate.
Orchestration earns its keep when independent specialist roles measurably improve the outcome, or when parallel work and adversarial review matter. Otherwise it is extra state, extra failure paths, and extra model spend.
Not the right call if one bounded agent or deterministic workflow meets the target, or roles are labels without distinct data, tools, or acceptance tests.
01
Independent specialist roles measurably improve the outcome.
02
Parallel work or adversarial review matters to the workflow.
03
Handoff contracts and shared-state ownership can be explicit.
Multi-agent orchestration coordinates specialized model-driven workers across a workflow. It adds handoffs, state, failure propagation, and operating cost, so the architecture must justify those additional boundaries.
It fits workflows where independent roles, parallel work, or adversarial review measurably outperform one bounded agent or deterministic pipeline. Start smaller unless tests show the extra coordination is necessary.
Builderz uses three entry offers: Architecture and delivery sprint ($3K-$5K), Production build ($10K-$40K), Reliability and rescue sprint ($5K-$15K). The project brief determines which offer fits; the proposal then defines scope, owner, acceptance criteria, exclusions, payment schedule, and change control.
Builderz starts with the workflow, authority boundaries, failure modes, and acceptance tests. Reliability targets, security controls, support terms, and deployment constraints are written into the accepted scope rather than implied as blanket guarantees.
Bring the proposed roles, handoff contract, shared-state rules, failure and retry policy, evaluation cases, model budget, and evidence that one agent or a deterministic workflow is insufficient.
Let's work together
Tell us what is blocked, who owns the decision, and what budget is approved. Qualified briefs get a one-business-day review.
Acceptance in writing
Criteria agreed before build starts
Proposal in 48h
After a qualified scoping call
Change control
Scope, exclusions, and owners named