AI and blockchain integration
Agents that can touch Solana programs — with named tools, spend limits, and a human in the loop where it counts. Autonomy only where ownership is real.
01
Agents that propose or execute program calls when tools, permissions, cost envelopes, and human approval gates are explicit
02
Models that score paths, size risk, or draft transactions for operators—not open-ended unattended trading promises
03
Conditional Solana program calls driven by evaluated signals with ownership maps and acceptance tests
04
Access and metering rules tied to holdings when the gate, billing path, and revocation behavior are testable
05
Attestations or audit trails for model outputs that operators need to defend—scoped to what you can prove
06
Proposal drafting and treasury tooling with explicit authority—never unattended control of funds or upgrades
01
Named tools, position and spend caps, circuit breakers, and human approval on high-value actions. The authority map is written before anything can sign.
02
Conditional Solana program calls driven by evaluated signals, with the accounts, authorities, and irreversible operations enumerated rather than discovered.
03
Monitoring, traces, and evaluation against the scoped workflow — plus the gates a model version has to clear before it ships to mainnet.
Connecting a model to on-chain execution is worth doing when the trigger, the permissions, and the cost envelope can be made explicit. Where they cannot, the honest answer is a smaller integration or none.
Not the right call if the plan depends on open-ended autonomy over consequential accounts, or nobody can define what an unsafe or incorrect on-chain action looks like.
01
The trigger, permitted programs, and spend envelope can be made explicit.
02
Someone owns the authority map and the incident path.
03
High-value actions can keep a human approval step.
It means connecting models, tools, and Solana programs when the trigger, permissions, cost envelope, and acceptance tests are explicit. Solana provides accounts, authorities, and cheap transactions; the model provides scored decisions—not open-ended autonomy.
Agents that can propose or execute program calls only through named tools, risk limits, and approval paths. Builderz scopes Solana-side authorities and fail-closed defaults; unattended full-wallet control is out of scope unless ownership and tests make that risk acceptable.
With written limits: backtests where data exists, spend and position caps, circuit breakers, monitoring, and human approval for high-value actions. Reliability is proven against acceptance tests for the scoped workflow—not a blanket accuracy guarantee.
Yes when program interfaces, authorities, and failure modes are documented. Typical surfaces include scoring positions, drafting transactions, or enforcing policy before send. Integration depth depends on the protocol surface you own or can safely call.
Builderz accepts scoped AI and Solana production builds in the current $10K-$40K engagement range. Multi-phase programs start with an architecture sprint to define model, data, on-chain, and operational boundaries.
Solana is the priority intake lane for AI + on-chain work—fast confirmation and low fees fit high-frequency agent actions. Other chains only when the product constraints and operating ownership are explicit.
Version models behind the same authority and evaluation gates as the first ship. Updates ship when acceptance tests pass; there is no default continuous-retrain pipeline unless the engagement funds data, eval, and rollback ownership.
Yes, when the access rule, billing path, and authority map are explicit. Typical patterns include token- or NFT-gated model access, usage metering, and royalty accounting—scoped against acceptance tests rather than open-ended product roadmaps.
Production build · $10K-$40K
Book a 20-minute intro call, or send a short project brief. We reply within one business day on qualified work.
Acceptance in writing
Criteria agreed before build starts
Proposal in 48h
After a qualified scoping call
Change control
Scope, exclusions, and owners named
Solana delivery evidence
Primary proof · Solana
Can this team work across the program, integration, and product boundary?
Historical product records and current public scaffolds show work across Solana applications, wallet integration, xNFT surfaces, and supporting product systems.
Send Solana project briefA Solana-backed product delivery record spanning application and research-funding workflows.
A competition and leaderboard experience delivered for a Solana trading product.
Inspect the application structure, wallet integration, TypeScript, and frontend conventions directly.
Solana engineering guides