Honest Evaluation Required

Should Your Web2 Company Add Blockchain?

We are blockchain specialists and we will tell you the truth: most companies do not need Web3. But if blockchain genuinely solves a problem for you, Solana is often the best choice.

🚨 Reality Check: If you cannot clearly explain the problem blockchain solves for your users, you do not need it (yet).

When Web3 Actually Makes Sense

Real use cases where blockchain adds genuine value (not just hype)

Token-Based Loyalty Programs

Problem: Traditional points expire, cannot be traded, lack transparency

Web3 Solution: Blockchain tokens users actually own and can trade/transfer

βœ“ MAKES SENSE

High-value loyalty program with engaged community

βœ— SKIP IT

Small user base or low engagement (traditional works fine)

πŸ“ EXAMPLES

Starbucks Odyssey (NFT rewards), airline miles tokenization

NFT-Gated Premium Content

Problem: Subscription management, account sharing, payment friction

Web3 Solution: NFT ownership = access, tradeable memberships

βœ“ MAKES SENSE

Exclusive communities, course platforms, membership clubs (can use email login + embedded wallets for non-crypto users)

βœ— SKIP IT

Mass-market content where blockchain adds cost without value

πŸ“ EXAMPLES

Educational platforms, mastermind groups, VIP access

Decentralized Identity/Auth

Problem: Password management, data breaches, platform lock-in

Web3 Solution: Wallet-based login with email/social options (Web3Auth, Magic Link), user owns their data

βœ“ MAKES SENSE

Privacy-focused products, multi-platform ecosystems, apps serving both crypto and non-crypto users

βœ— SKIP IT

Simple apps where traditional auth is sufficient

πŸ“ EXAMPLES

Developer tools, cross-platform services, hybrid Web2/Web3 apps

Crowdfunding via Token Launches

Problem: Traditional fundraising slow, equity dilutive, geographic restrictions

Web3 Solution: Token sales, community ownership, global access

βœ“ MAKES SENSE

Crypto-native products, network effects products

βœ— SKIP IT

Traditional businesses (VCs/banks offer better terms)

πŸ“ EXAMPLES

Protocol launches, community-driven platforms

Common Web3 Mistakes to Avoid

We've seen these red flags too many times. Learn from others' mistakes.

"Blockchain will solve everything"

Blockchain solves specific problems (trust, ownership, coordination). It does not make bad products good.

🚩 Red Flag: If you cannot articulate the specific problem blockchain solves, you do not need it.

"We need to add NFTs to stay relevant"

NFTs are useful for ownership/access. They are not magic marketing pixie dust.

🚩 Red Flag: If the only reason is "competitors are doing it", skip it.

"Blockchain makes it decentralized automatically"

Using blockchain β‰  decentralized. You can build centralized apps on blockchain (and most do).

🚩 Red Flag: If you are running all the infrastructure, you are not decentralized.

"Our users are demanding Web3"

Are they? Or is it Twitter tech bros? Survey your actual paying customers. Note: Email login solutions (Web3Auth, Magic) can onboard non-crypto users.

🚩 Red Flag: If you force manual wallet setup on mainstream users without offering email login alternatives.

4 Questions to Answer Honestly

Before spending $50k+ on Web3 integration, answer these truthfully:

1. Does blockchain solve a problem your users actually have?

Good Sign

Yes - high fees, slow settlement, lack of ownership

Bad Sign

No - but competitors are doing it

2. Can you abstract away crypto complexity for users?

Good Sign

Yes - using email login with embedded wallets (Web3Auth, Magic) or users are crypto-native

Bad Sign

No - and you are forcing manual wallet management on mainstream users

3. Does the value justify the complexity?

Good Sign

Yes - blockchain enables new revenue/features

Bad Sign

No - it is just a marketing angle

4. Is your team capable of maintaining blockchain infrastructure?

Good Sign

Yes - or we have partners/agencies

Bad Sign

No - and we have no budget for it

Integration Paths (If You Decide to Proceed)

Start small, validate, then scaleβ€”or skip it entirely

RECOMMENDED START

Minimal Integration

$15k - $35k
2-4 weeks

Add wallet login or accept crypto payments

What's Included:

  • Wallet connect integration (Phantom, Solflare)
  • Email/social login with embedded wallets (optional)
  • Token payment acceptance
  • Basic transaction history

Best for: Testing Web3 with minimal risk

Moderate Integration

$50k - $100k
8-12 weeks

NFT memberships or token-gated features for mainstream users

What's Included:

  • Email login with embedded wallets (Web3Auth/Magic)
  • NFT minting infrastructure
  • Token-gated content system
  • Ownership verification

Best for: Premium features for non-crypto-native users

Full Web3 Product

$150k - $400k
16-24 weeks

Blockchain-native functionality

What's Included:

  • Custom smart contracts
  • Decentralized logic
  • Token economics design
  • Full Web3 UX

Best for: Crypto-native products only

If You Do Need Blockchain, Why Solana?

For Web2 companies integrating blockchain, Solana minimizes the pain

Users Will Not Notice It Is Blockchain

Sub-second transactions feel like Web2. No waiting for confirmation screens.

Transaction Costs Are Negligible

$0.00025 per transaction means you can subsidize gas for users. Try that on Ethereum.

Email Login for Mainstream Users

Use Web3Auth or Magic Link for email/social login with embedded wallets. Users get Web3 benefits without managing seed phrases.

Proven at Scale

Handles 65,000 TPS. You will not outgrow it (Ethereum: 15 TPS).

Not Sure If Web3 Makes Sense for Your Company?

Get a free, honest evaluation. We are Solana specialists who will tell you if blockchain genuinely helps or if you should save your money and skip it.

βœ“ No obligation Β· βœ“ Honest advice (even if we say do not do it) Β· βœ“ 30-minute call