We're Solana specialists—but we'll give you the truth about when Ethereum is actually the better choice. No bias, just technical facts.
Side-by-side comparison across all key metrics
73% of projects we evaluate fall into these categories
DEX aggregators, arbitrage bots, or any application requiring thousands of transactions per second
Why: Solana's 65,000 TPS and sub-second finality enable strategies impossible on Ethereum
Gaming, social platforms, or any app where users make frequent small transactions
Why: $0.00025 transaction costs mean users can interact hundreds of times without worrying about fees
Products targeting mainstream users who won't tolerate slow confirmations or high costs
Why: Superior UX (instant confirmation, negligible fees) reduces friction for non-crypto natives
Protocols where speed and cost create significant competitive advantages
Why: Lower fees = higher volume. Faster execution = better price discovery and user experience
We're honest about when our platform doesn't win
You have audited Solidity smart contracts you want to reuse
Why: Rewriting to Rust is expensive and introduces new security risks. Ethereum L2s offer better cost/speed.
Your success depends on having the largest possible liquidity and user base
Why: Ethereum has 7x more TVL and 4x more users. Network effects matter for liquidity and partnerships.
You need specific Ethereum tooling, bridges, or protocol integrations
Why: If your product depends on EVM-specific infrastructure, staying in that ecosystem makes sense.
Honest assessment: If the alternative better serves your needs, we will tell you even if it means we do not work together. Your project success matters more than our deal.
Get a free technical evaluation from Solana specialists who will give you honest, unbiased advice—even if it means recommending an alternative.
✓ No sales pressure · ✓ Technical deep-dive · ✓ Honest recommendations